Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fertilizer placement and soil chiseling did not influence pol, brix, fiber, or ATR.

A claim from Soil chiseling and fertilizer location in sugarcane ratoon cultivation · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer placement and soil chiseling did not influence pol, brix, fiber, or ATR.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
fertilizer deposition form and soil chiselinge0
Outcome
pol (%), brix (%), fiber (%), and ATR (kg Mg-1)e0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“The agroindustrial variables pol (%), brix (%), fiber (%), and ATR (kg Mg-1) were not influenced by the fertilizer deposition form and soil chiseling.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1287
e1

“cultivated with sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–260

Title

Soil chiseling and fertilizer location in sugarcane ratoon cultivation

Aloisio Bianchini; Daniel D. Valadão Junior; Rodrigo P. Rosa; et al. Engenharia Agrícola 2014. doi:10.1590/s0100-69162014000100007

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-e4fe03e4ec4fd434f7729a20ccc6841f1b8e5c003e06fc3e86b06f375f28e9a5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

104 papers: 91 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 91 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

95 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.