Intervention effectmodel-written summary

E. purpurascens significantly reduced white mold incidence in two trials.

A claim from Evaluation of filamentous fungi isolated from petals of bean and rapeseed for suppression of white mold · 1992

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

E. purpurascens significantly reduced white mold incidence in two trials.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
E. purpurascense0
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume1pathogen
Second interactor
E. purpurascensEpicoccum nigrume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
incidence of white molde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
two trialse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Epicoccum nigrum
Epicoccum nigrum · Second interactorThis image was created by user Walt Sturgeon (Mycowalt) at Mushroom Observer , a source for mycological images. You can contact this user here . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drechslera sp. and E. purpurascens significantly reduced the incidence of white mold in one and two trials, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1278
e1

“white mold caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–125
t0

“bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60

Title

Evaluation of filamentous fungi isolated from petals of bean and rapeseed for suppression of white mold

G. D. Inglis; G. J. Boland Canadian Journal of Microbiology 1992. doi:10.1139/m92-020

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e569db6734cc231eeafa0c31f646b473fc2d991a09c6c37009e91e0e88d18d4a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

Epicoccum nigrum · Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.