Claim · model-written summary
Waterlogging at the jointing stage caused the second-largest yield penalty, after the tillering stage.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- jointing stagee1
- Outcome
- yield penaltiese1
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede1
- Qualifier
- followed bye1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“waterlogging in winter wheat”
e1“the greatest yield penalties occurred by waterlogging at the tillering stage (10%–15% decrease), followed by the jointing stage”
Title
Xiaoli Wu; Yonglu Tang; Chaosu Li; et al. Plant Production Science 2015. doi:10.1626/pps.18.284
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Waterlogging at the tillering stage caused the greatest yield penalty, a 10%–15% decrease.
- Observation Waterlogging at the grain filling stage had less effect on yield.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging at the tillering stage reduced spike and grain numbers per m2.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging at the jointing and booting stages reduced grain weight through reduced dry matter translocation.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging at the tillering stage significantly reduced chlorophyll content.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging at the tillering stage lowered Fv/Fm, apparent electron transport rate and effective quantum yield of photosystem II.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging at the tillering stage lowered photochemical quenching (qP).
- Intervention effect Waterlogging at the grain filling stage improved leaf photosynthetic capacity and grain yield.
- Observation The tillering stage was the most susceptible growth stage of wheat to waterlogging.
- Recommendation The authors suggest that maintaining photosynthetic performance after anthesis could be a strategy for increasing wheat grain yield.