Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation omissions reduced biological yield.

A claim from EFFECT OF PLANTING DENSITY AND SKIPPING IRRIGATION AT CERTAIN GROWTH STAGES ON YIELD POTENTIALITY OF SOME MAIZE HYBRIDS · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation omissions reduced biological yield.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment
both irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
10.36 and 11.19%e0
Comparator
normal irrigatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both irrigation treatments caused significant reduction in grain and biological yields/fad., which reached 17.54 and 9.75% in grain yield as well as 10.36 and 11.19% in biological yield compared with normal irrigation, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1067
t0

“MAIZE HYBRIDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–119

Title

EFFECT OF PLANTING DENSITY AND SKIPPING IRRIGATION AT CERTAIN GROWTH STAGES ON YIELD POTENTIALITY OF SOME MAIZE HYBRIDS

Haytham El-Shahed; M Saleh; S Mowafy; et al. Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research 2013. doi:10.21608/zjar.2013.78018

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e5995b1fdab116c583e9ce7918f96c79cd6bacb471e901bfcc7e5d7f6fa7c072 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

224 papers in the same direction as this claim · 791 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1,007 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.