Claim · model-written summary
Row type did not affect seed weight at either site.
- Taxon
- Soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- Row typee0
- Outcome
- seed weighte0
- Direction
- did not effecte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Row type or seeding rate did not effect seed weight at either site.”
t0“Soybean”
Title
Comparisons of Single‐Row and Twin‐Row Soybean Production in the Mid‐South
H. Arnold Bruns Agronomy Journal 2011. doi:10.2134/agronj2010.0475
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Intervention effect Despite irrigation, 2010 drought and maximum temperatures reduced soybean stands, yields and seed weight at both sites.
- Intervention effect Twin rows produced more soybean plants than similar single rows.
- Intervention effect Twin-row yields increased relative to single rows on clay, helped by higher plant numbers.
- Intervention effect Soybean yields on clay did not differ among seeding rates.
- Intervention effect MG IV twin-row yields on sandy loam exceeded single rows only at 40 and 50 seeds m −2.
- Intervention effect MG V yields on sandy loam did not differ between row types.
- Observation MG IV tended to yield better than MG V at both sites.
- Observation MG IV averaged 20 nodes plant −1 versus 15 for MG V.
- Observation MG IV on sandy loam averaged 59 pods plant −1.
- Observation MG V on sandy loam averaged 59 pods plant −1.
- Observation MG V produced 70 pods plant −1 compared with 63 for MG IV on clay.
- Intervention effect Twin rows did not produce more pods per soybean plant.
- Intervention effect Seeding rate did not affect seed weight at either site.
- Observation MG IV had greater seeds per area on sandy loam.
- Association Seeds per area corresponded with yield on sandy loam, but not on clay.