Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Delayed fertilization appeared not to affect EAMV seed transmission.

A claim from Further studies on seed transmission of broad bean stain virus and Echtes Ackerbohnenmosaik ‐Virus in field beans (Vicia faba) · 1977

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed fertilization appeared not to affect EAMV seed transmission.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
Delaying fertilizatione0
Interactor
EAMVe1pathogen
Outcome
seed transmissione0
Direction
seemed not to affecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Delaying fertilization in plants infected with BBSV or EAMV seemed not to affect seed transmission of either virus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–752
t0

“seed transmission of broad bean stain virus and Echtes Ackerbohnenmosaik ‐Virus in field beans (Vicia faba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–126
e1

“Broad bean stain virus (BBSV) and Echtes Ackerbohnenmosaik‐Virus (EAMV) were detected in the seed coat and embryo sac fluid of immature seeds from infected field beans (Viciafaba minor) by inoculation to Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–230

Title

Further studies on seed transmission of broad bean stain virus and Echtes Ackerbohnenmosaik ‐Virus in field beans (Vicia faba)

S. VORRA‐URAI; A. J. COCKBAIN Annals of Applied Biology 1977. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1977.tb01901.x

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-e5e90455161c88dc4be88eef42500941432486518bb622fd0e5a6ecbb79b817b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

fertilization · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 20 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.