Claim · model-written summary
The i-i pattern showed smaller seed-yield variability than d-i.
- Taxon
- Vicia faba L.
Vicia fabat0 - Treatment
- i-i patternse0
- Outcome
- seed yield variabilitye0
- Direction
- smallere0
- Comparator
- d-ie0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The i-i patterns, compared with d-i, resulted in suboptimum DM partitioning to reproductive organs, but showed a smaller seed yield variability”
t0“Vicia faba L.”
Title
C. Grashoff Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 1990. doi:10.18174/njas.v38i2.16600
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Mild flowering-stage water shortage followed by ample water gave high seed yield at lower nodes of cv. Alfred.
- Intervention effect The i-d water pattern yielded 20-60% less seed at lower nodes than d-i.
- Intervention effect The i-i water pattern yielded 20-60% less seed at lower nodes than d-i.
- Mechanism Lower pod number per node mainly explained the lower seed yields.
- Observation The i-i pattern compensated low pod retention at lower nodes with retention at higher nodes.
- Observation The i-d pattern did not compensate lower-node pod retention at higher nodes.
- Association Total dry matter production alone explained 75-85% of seed-yield variation.
- Association Adding water-supply patterns explained more than 90% of seed-yield variation.
- Intervention effect The i-i pattern caused suboptimal dry-matter partitioning to reproductive organs relative to d-i.