Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zero tillage had the highest spike length, tiller number and grains per spike.

A claim from Response of Wheat (Triticum Aestivum) Cultivars to Different Tillage Practices Grown under Rice-wheat Cropping System · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage had the highest spike length, tiller number and grains per spike.

Treatment
Zero tillagee0
Outcome
spike length number of tillers, number of grains spike-1e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, the spike length number of tillers, number of grains spike-1, 1000- grain weight, biological yield, and harvest index were the highest in Zero tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1028
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17

Title

Response of Wheat (Triticum Aestivum) Cultivars to Different Tillage Practices Grown under Rice-wheat Cropping System

Ali Imran; Jamil Shafi; Nadeem Akbar; et al. Universal Journal of Plant Science 2013. doi:10.13189/ujps.2013.010403

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-e666d4830fb2de3cac72bef6b74108336ff8823b6accce5fa929a154c165d8a0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
    Wheat grain yield did not differ among tillage systems in any year or across years.

    Economics of Conservation Tillage in a Wheat–Fallow Rotation · 2002 · compared with among tillage systems

    No difference from an alternativeCited by this paper

  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1,405 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.