Claim · model-written summary
The GASdeg technique had a bias correction factor of 0.74.
- Taxon
- Thinopyrum ponticum
Thinopyrum obtusiflorumt0 - Outcome
- correction factorse1
- Value
- 0.74e1
- Qualifier
- for GASdege1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Thinopyrum ponticum (Tall Wheatgrass) Hay and Haylage”
e1“correction factors of 0.34 for T&Tdig, 0.74 for GASdeg, and 0.88 for DAISYdig”
Title
P. Ricci; A.J. Romera; J.C. Burges; et al. The Professional Animal Scientist 2009. doi:10.15232/s1080-7446(15)30766-x
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Method / resource In vitro digestibility techniques correlated more highly with in vivo digestibility (R2 0.93 to 0.97) than the VSdig and Rodig predictive equations (R2 0.64 and 0.35).
- Method / resource Biases were observed in all in vitro digestibility techniques.
- Method / resource The T&Tdig technique had a bias correction factor of 0.34.
- Method / resource The DAISYdig technique had a bias correction factor of 0.88.
- Method / resource DAISYdig had the greatest concordance with in vivo digestibility (ρc = 0.85), above T&Tdig and GASdeg.
- Method / resource The predictive equations VSdig and Rodig had the poorest concordance with in vivo digestibility (ρc 0.21 and 0.33).
- Recommendation DAISYdig or GASdeg is recommended for estimating digestibility of tall wheatgrass forage, depending on requirements.