Claim · model-written summary
Tillage and residue treatments did not produce significant rice grain yield differences.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- Tillage methods and residue treatmente0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tillage methods and residue treatment produced no significant grain yield differences.”
t0“Rice-Maize”
Title
Conservation agriculture options for a Rice-Maize cropping systems in Bangladesh
AKM Saiful Islam; MM Hossain; MA Saleque Bangladesh Rice Journal 2015. doi:10.3329/brj.v18i1-2.23002
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Minimum tillage saved 60-66% of land preparation fuel.
- Intervention effect Minimum tillage saved 70-74% of land preparation labour.
- Intervention effect Minimum tillage significantly reduced preparation cost.
- Intervention effect Minimum tillage had greater weed infestation, influencing production cost.
- Intervention effect Unpuddled strip tillage required more rice transplanting time because of poor visibility and hard soil.
- Intervention effect Bed planting incurred the lowest production cost.
- Intervention effect Tillage and residue treatments did not produce significant maize grain yield differences.
- Intervention effect Rice with single pass wet tillage gave the highest gross margin over time.
- Intervention effect Maize with strip tillage gave the highest gross margin over time.
- Recommendation Minimum tillage could increase rice-maize profitability if weeds are adequately controlled with herbicides.