Claim · model-written summary
Soil compaction parameters differed among treatments in 2004 and 2005.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Outcome
- soil compaction parameterse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“soil compaction parameters in 2004 and 2005”
t0“Cotton”
Title
Investigation of the Effects of Soil Compaction in Cotton
S. S. Kulkarni; S. G. Bajwa; G. Huitink Transactions of the ASABE 2010. doi:10.13031/2013.30058
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Observation Reflectance differed among compaction treatments in 2003 and 2004.
- Observation Soil EC differed among treatments in 2005.
- Observation Yield differed among treatments in 2005.
- Association Hardpan depth and thickness correlated with green NDVI in 2003.
- Association Hardpan depth was related to yield in 2005.
- Association Hardpan resistance was related to yield in 2005.
- Association Soil EC was related to yield in 2005.
- Method / resource The combined soil variables explained 65% of cotton yield variability.
- Intervention effect Compaction affected canopy reflectance.
- Intervention effect Compaction reduced cotton yield in Arkansas.
- Recommendation The authors propose EC and canopy reflectance to infer yield and compaction.