Claim · model-written summary
Bacterial treatments differed significantly in wheat take-all severity across three fungal isolates.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- treatmentse0
- Interactor
- Gaeumannomyces graminis var tritici
Gaeumannomyces graminist0pathogen - Outcome
- Disease severitye0
- Value
- 0-6 scalee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Disease severity was assessed based on 0-6 scale and in all three fungal isolates, there were significant differences between treatments (p<0.01).”
t0“Gaeumannomyces graminis var tritici causal agent of wheat take-all disease”
Title
Elahe Babaeipoor, African Journal of Microbiology Research 2011. doi:10.5897/ajmr11.789
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect In growth chamber tests with fungal isolate 35, P. fluorescens VN performed best against wheat take-all.
- Intervention effect For fungal isolate 23, wheat treated with P. fluorescens VN and 196 had less disease.
- Intervention effect For fungal isolate 35, greenhouse wheat treated with P. putida strain 10 had no infection.
- Intervention effect For fungal isolate 35, greenhouse wheat treated with P. fluorescens VN had no infection.
- Intervention effect Growth indices did not differ between intact wheat and wheat treated with bacteria in the absence of fungal inoculation.
- Mechanism The authors infer that bacterial promotion of wheat growth occurs through disease control.