Claim · model-written summary
Arthur wheat showed higher nitrate uptake effectiveness than Atlas 66 wheat at 0.1 and 1.0 mM nitrate.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume3 - Material
- Arthure3
- Treatment
- 0.1 and 1.0 m M nitrate concentrationse3
- Outcome
- uptake of nitratee3
- Direction
- higher effectivenesse3
- Qualifier
- these differences were not obtained at higher nitrate concentrationse4
- Comparator
- Atlas 66e3
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Triticale '6TA 385', 'Arthur' wheat, and 'Abruzzi' rye showed higher effectiveness than triticale '6TA 203', 'Atlas 66' wheat, and 'Vitagraze' rye in the uptake of nitrate at 0.1 and 1.0 m M nitrate concentrations”
e4“but these differences were not obtained at higher nitrate concentrations”
Title
Nitrate Uptake Effectiveness of Different Cultivars of Triticale, Wheat, and Rye1
L. M. Mugwira; S. M. Elgawhary; A. E. Allen Agronomy Journal 1980. doi:10.2134/agronj1980.00021962007200040003x
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Increasing nitrate concentration from 0.1 to 2.5 mM increased plant dry matter and N uptake.
- Observation Few significant differences among the cultivars were observed at nitrate concentrations greater than 2.5 mM.
- Intervention effect Root uptake coefficients decreased with increasing nitrate concentration.
- Association Triticale 6TA 385 showed higher nitrate uptake effectiveness than triticale 6TA 203 at 0.1 and 1.0 mM nitrate.
- Association Abruzzi rye showed higher nitrate uptake effectiveness than Vitagraze rye at 0.1 and 1.0 mM nitrate.
- Observation Triticale, wheat and rye had similar nitrate uptake effectiveness, with varietal differences within each species.