Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The two named treatments had lowest weed dry-matter production versus non-mulched groundnut plots, with reported values 51.2 and 54.5 g/plot of 27 m 2.

A claim from Weed control in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) with polyethylene film mulching · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two named treatments had lowest weed dry-matter production versus non-mulched groundnut plots, with reported values 51.2 and 54.5 g/plot of 27 m 2.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
crop grown under polyethylene film mulching and (2) pre-planting incorporation of fluchloralin in the flat-bed system of sowinge0
Outcome
weed dry-matter productione0
Direction
loweste0
Value
51.2 and 54.5 g/plot of 27 m 2e0
Comparator
non-mulched plotse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–47
e0

“two (1) crop grown under polyethylene film mulching and (2) pre-planting incorporation of fluchloralin in the flat-bed system of sowing registered the lowest weed numbers at harvest (106.7 and 113.7/plot of 27 m 2 in 1997 - 98 and 1998 - 99 respectively), the lowest weed dry-matter production (51.2 and 54.5 g/plot of 27 m 2 ), maximum weed control efficiency (62.1 and 57.4%) and weed control index (83.0 and 81.1%), the highest number of matured pods/plant (17.6 and 18.0), 100 kernel weight (48.6 and 48.7 g), percentage shelling (72.6 and 72.8) and a dry pod yield of 2451 and 2468 kg ha -1 when compared with non-mulched plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–954

Title

Weed control in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) with polyethylene film mulching

K. Subrahmaniyan; P. Kalaiselvan; N. Arulmozhi International Journal of Pest Management 2002. doi:10.1080/09670870210133698

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e73ce49dceaf394ebe7d26df28d3ccc4d2ca0a6f3500213a28dd96abda1a03e4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Fluchloralin · weed · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

mulching · weed · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.