Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Maize harvested for fodder increased groundnut pod yield/ha by 54.59 and 27.80% compared with intercropped groundnut grown with maize harvested for grain without defoliation.

A claim from Maximizing Land Equivalent Ratio and Economic Return by Intercropping Maize with Peanut under Sandy Soil in Egypt · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize harvested for fodder increased groundnut pod yield/ha by 54.59 and 27.80% compared with intercropped groundnut grown with maize harvested for grain without defoliation.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
harvested maize plants for foddere1
Outcome
pod yield/hae1
Direction
incremente1
Value
54.59 and 27.80%e1
Comparator
harvested maize for grains without defoliatione1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“harvested maize plants for fodder produced the highest increment in pod yield/ha by (54.59 and 27.80%), during the first and second seasons, respectively, as compared with intercropped groundnut plants with harvested maize for grains without defoliation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1200

Title

Maximizing Land Equivalent Ratio and Economic Return by Intercropping Maize with Peanut under Sandy Soil in Egypt

Abd El-Alim Metwally; Sayed Safina; Yaser Hefny Egyptian Journal of Agronomy 2018. doi:10.21608/agro.2018.2168.1087

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-e7742524e02145b2252b9bfa70c0d28cc35029426e2ce8bad9697669e91434fa · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Zea mays · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 18 positive, 6 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.