Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Semiperennial rotation reduced maize yield variability from 22% to 13% relative to monoculture.

A claim from Biodiversity can support a greener revolution in Africa · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Semiperennial rotation reduced maize yield variability from 22% to 13% relative to monoculture.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SP rotation systems at half-fertilizer ratese0
Outcome
yield variabilitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
22% to 13%e0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SP rotation systems at half-fertilizer rates produced equivalent quantities of grain, on a more stable basis (yield variability reduced from 22% to 13%) compared with monoculture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1437
t0

“monoculture maize with legume-diversified maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–954

Title

Biodiversity can support a greener revolution in Africa

Sieglinde S. Snapp; Malcolm J. Blackie; Robert A. Gilbert; et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010. doi:10.1073/pnas.1007199107

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e7838300d37b13ac9528880a37e37f177d0b9c4b9fc17738f9a20f382c3c74f6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

rotation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 254 positive, 68 negative or no effect

253 papers in the same direction as this claim · 52 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
  8. negative

313 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.