Claim · model-written summary
Lower density had lower input costs and less stress susceptibility.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- lower densitye0
- Outcome
- input costs and less susceptibility to environmental and plant nutritional stressese0
- Direction
- lowere0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Furthermore, planting at the lower density has the advantages of lower input costs and less susceptibility to environmental and plant nutritional stresses.”
t0“soybean”
Title
Feasibility of Lowering Soybean Planting Density without Compromising Nitrogen Fixation and Yield
Marcos Javier de Luca; Marco Antonio Nogueira; Mariangela Hungria Agronomy Journal 2014. doi:10.2134/agronj14.0234
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Lower plant density increased nodule number and mass.
- Intervention effect Lower density generally did not affect nutritional status.
- Intervention effect Lower density increased seed oil content by 3.4%.
- Intervention effect Lower density decreased protein by 4.5%.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen source affected nodulation.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen source did not affect nutritional status or grain yield.
- Intervention effect A 75% density reduction lowered yield 16% in only one of three seasons.