Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Lower density had lower input costs and less stress susceptibility.

A claim from Feasibility of Lowering Soybean Planting Density without Compromising Nitrogen Fixation and Yield · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower density had lower input costs and less stress susceptibility.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
lower densitye0
Outcome
input costs and less susceptibility to environmental and plant nutritional stressese0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furthermore, planting at the lower density has the advantages of lower input costs and less susceptibility to environmental and plant nutritional stresses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1628
t0

“soybean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 24–31

Title

Feasibility of Lowering Soybean Planting Density without Compromising Nitrogen Fixation and Yield

Marcos Javier de Luca; Marco Antonio Nogueira; Mariangela Hungria Agronomy Journal 2014. doi:10.2134/agronj14.0234

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e7f4110758f4f089d1b51518dfb860ff19788109d98d205e7ca40f3ae9b27159 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer