Claim · model-written summary
Quzhou mean yield gap was 2.8 t ha−1 and PFPN gap 41.1 kg kg−1.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The mean total yield gap and PFPN gap were 3.6 t ha−1 and 43.3 kg kg−1 in Laoling, 2.2 t ha−1 and 24.5 kg kg−1 in Xushui, and 2.8 t ha−1 and 41.1 kg kg−1 in Quzhou”
t0“Summer Maize”
Title
Guangfeng Chen; Hongzhu Cao; Jun Liang; et al. Sustainability 2018. doi:10.3390/su10020363
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Observation Summer maize grain yield ranged from 6.6 to 14.2 t ha−1 and averaged 10.5 t ha−1.
- Observation PFPN ranged from 15.4 to 96.1 kg kg−1 and averaged 49.1 kg kg−1.
- Observation Laoling mean yield gap was 3.6 t ha−1 and PFPN gap 43.3 kg kg−1.
- Observation Xushui mean yield gap was 2.2 t ha−1 and PFPN gap 24.5 kg kg−1.
- Association Yield gap and PFPN gap were positively correlated.
- Association Reducing yield gap 1 t ha−1 could reduce PFPN gap 6.0 kg kg−1.
- Association High yield and PFPN fields had higher plant density than low yield and PFPN fields.
- Association High yield and PFPN fields had lower nitrogen fertilizer rates.
- Association Plant density contributed slightly more to the yield gap than other management practices.
- Mechanism Low PFPN was mainly attributed to excess nitrogen fertilizer.
- Recommendation The authors recommend programs to help farmers adopt optimal management practices.