Regression models with final disease rating or area under disease progress curve were significant, but explained only low to moderate variance in dry biomass yield (0.21 < R 2 < 0.60).

Claim · model-written summary

Regression models with final disease rating or area under disease progress curve were significant, but explained only low to moderate variance in dry biomass yield (0.21 < R 2 < 0.60).

Taxon

switchgrassPanicum virgatume2

Treatment

final disease ratinge6

Interactor

Puccinia emaculataPuccinia emaculatat0pathogen

Outcome

coefficients of determinatione6

Value

0.21 < R 2 < 0.60e6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

e6

“Linear regression models with the final disease rating, as well as with the area under disease progress curve in each year, were significant, but coefficients of determination were low to moderate (0.21 < R 2 < 0.60)”

e2

“vegetatively propagated switchgrass cultivar Cloud Nine”

t0

“Puccinia emaculata”