Claim · model-written summary
All inoculations reduced seed weight in both years.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Verbatim
e5“all inoculations reduced seed weight in both years”
e7“prevention of early infection by M. pinodes will provide the best economic return in a mycosphaerella blight control program on field pea”
Title
A. G. Xue; T. D. Warkentin; E. O. Kenaschuk Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1997. doi:10.4141/p96-150
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Association Inoculation with Mycosphaerella pinodes at 8–10 nodes had the greatest impact on disease and yield parameters in 1994.
- Association Inoculation at mid-flowering had the greatest impact on disease and yield parameters in 1995.
- Association Inoculation at the pod swell stage had the lowest impact in both years.
- Intervention effect Inoculation at 8–10 nodes reduced yield by 31% in 1994.
- Intervention effect Inoculation at mid-flowering reduced yield by 24% in 1994.
- Intervention effect Inoculation at the pod swell stage reduced yield by 19% in 1994.
- Intervention effect Inoculation at 8–10 nodes reduced yield by 33% in 1995.
- Intervention effect Inoculation at mid-flowering reduced yield by 43% in 1995.
- Intervention effect Inoculation at the pod swell stage reduced yield by 30% in 1995.
- Association The 1000-seed weight was not affected by the timing of inoculation.
- Association Plant-to-seed transmission of M. pinodes was affected by the timing of inoculation in 1994.
- Association Plant-to-seed transmission of M. pinodes was not affected by the timing of inoculation in 1995.
- Recommendation Prevention of early infection by M. pinodes is recommended as the best economic return in a mycosphaerella blight control program on field pea.