Claim · model-written summary
Abarco stem biomass was 35.2 Mg ha-1 and 0.4 times higher.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSetting
Verbatim
e0“for abarco the stem volume (62.0 m3 ha-1) and stem biomass (35.2 Mg ha-1) were two and 0.4 times higher (p < 0.05), respectively”
Title
Jhon Jairo Zuluaga; Andrés Iván Prato; Jairo Rojas-Molina; et al. Forest Systems 2026. doi:10.5424/fs/2025343-20938
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation Both species showed similar survival, basal area and stem carbon stock.
- Observation Abarco stem volume was 62.0 m3 ha-1, twice that of móncoro.
- Observation Móncoro stem zinc accumulation was 41% higher.
- Observation Móncoro stem copper accumulation was 128% higher.
- Observation Móncoro stem Mg accumulation was +400 higher.
- Method / resource Spurr model had the highest volume-estimation accuracy, R2= 0.94.
- Method / resource Schumacher-Hall model had the highest volume-estimation accuracy, R2= 0.93.
- Observation Soil carbon content averaged 69.3 Mg ha-1 under both species without a significant difference.
- Observation Abarco showed higher commercial productivity than móncoro.