Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rootstock-imparted resistance raised marketable tomato yields by 88% to 125% over nongrafted plants.

A claim from Yield and Disease Resistance for Three Bacterial Wilt-resistant Tomato Rootstocks · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstock-imparted resistance raised marketable tomato yields by 88% to 125% over nongrafted plants.

Treatment
rootstock-imparted resistancee0
Outcome
marketable yieldse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
between 88% and 125%e0
Comparator
nongrafted plantse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81
e0

“The resultant rootstock-imparted resistance improved marketable yields by between 88% and 125% compared with the nongrafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1350

Title

Yield and Disease Resistance for Three Bacterial Wilt-resistant Tomato Rootstocks

David H Suchoff; Frank J. Louws; Christopher C. Gunter HortTechnology 2019. doi:10.21273/horttech04318-19

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-e95ac46b0e14d3c1a7e8fdb88811ee33ba5d711ef71c918c9e6b834604518cae · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

grafting · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

53 papers: 43 positive, 10 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Grafting did not alter total marketable yield of any cultivar.

    High Tunnel Production of Containerized Hybrid and Heirloom Tomatoes Using Grafted Plants with Two Types of Rootstocks · 2021

    Opposite directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    Grafting increased marketable tomato yield by 20 to 25% in both years.

    Influence of rootstock on vegetative growth, fruit yield and quality in ‘Cuore di Bue’, an heirloom tomato · 2010

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. positive
    The "vegetative" and "generative" rootstocks increased marketable and total fruit yields of both tomato scions, except beefsteak tomato with the "vegetative" rootstock in fall planting.

    A systematic assessment of how rootstock growth characteristics impact grafted tomato plant biomass, resource partitioning, yield, and fruit mineral composition · 2022 · compared with non-grafted scions

    Same directionCites this paper

  4. no effect
    Grafting did not significantly affect Flamme marketable yield in either year.

    Grafting for Root-knot Nematode Control and Yield Improvement in Organic Heirloom Tomato Production · 2012 · compared with Non-grafted and self-grafted scions

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Rootstocks had no significant effect on yield, fruit size, pericarp thickness and skin firmness.

    RESPONSES OF ROOTSTOCKS TO NUTRIENT INDUCED HIGH EC LEVELS ON YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY OF GRAFTED TOMATO CULTIVARS IN GREENHOUSE CONDITIONS · 2017

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    FOX1 used as a rootstock reduced fruit firmness of cherry tomato Sweet Heaven by 14.3%.

    Screening of tomato hybrids for resistance to Fusarium wilt · 2022

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Grafting did not improve marketable or total yield in 2018.

    Effects of Rootstock and Location on Open Field ‘BHN 589’ and ‘Nebraska Wedding’ Grafted Tomato Yield · 2023

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Most flavor and texture sensory parameters did not differ between grafting treatments.

    Performance of New Muchamiel Tomato Lines with Virus Resistance Genes Grafted onto Two Commercial Rootstocks · 2022

    Opposite direction

44 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.