Claim · model-written summary
The WE model performed better for B. forficata, with RMSE 1.14 leaves and 11.9 days.
- Taxon
- B. forficata
Bauhinia forficatae0 - Outcome
- B. forficatae0
- Value
- 1.14 leaves, 11.9 dayse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the WE model performed better for B. forficata (1.14 leaves, 11.9 days)”
Title
Mábele de Cássia Ferreira; Fabrina Bolzan Martins; Cássia Gabriele Dias; et al. Earth Systems and Environment 2026. doi:10.1007/s41748-026-01037-2
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Method / resource Both development models accurately estimated leaf number for all five forest species.
- Method / resource Both models had lower precision for development duration.
- Method / resource The Phyl model performed better for C. speciosa, with RMSE 1.30 leaves and 29.8 days.
- Method / resource The Phyl model performed better for H. chrysotrichus, with RMSE 1.41 leaves and 23.0 days.
- Method / resource The WE model performed better for H. impetiginosus, with RMSE 1.50 leaves and 32.3 days.
- Method / resource The WE model performed better for T. roseoalba, with RMSE 1.32 leaves and 25.2 days.
- Observation Future warming is projected to reduce development duration by 1 to 55 days for February to July sowing.
- Observation Future warming is projected to increase development duration by 1 to 24 days for August to January sowing.
- Recommendation Adjusting sowing schedules and controlling seedling environments are key adaptation strategies.