Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Wheat plant population varied only slightly (94.667 to 97.333 plants/m2) across moringa extract concentrations, without significant differences.

A claim from EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT DOSES OF MORINGA LEAF EXTRACT THROUGH FOLIAR APPLICATION ON WHEAT CROP · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat plant population varied only slightly (94.667 to 97.333 plants/m2) across moringa extract concentrations, without significant differences.

Treatment
different moringa extract concentrationse1
Outcome
plant populatione0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Value
94.667 to 97.333 plants/m²e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant population (94.667 to 97.333 plants/m²)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1012
e1

“the application of different moringa extract concentrations did not exert substantial influence on the measured wheat growth and yield parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1487

Title

EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT DOSES OF MORINGA LEAF EXTRACT THROUGH FOLIAR APPLICATION ON WHEAT CROP

MUHAMMAD SUBHAN; MUMTAZ HUSSAIN; MUHAMMAD JUNAID3; et al. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2023. doi:10.5281/zenodo.8362230

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e9f998931ce81be2547decc186eaf6348b83412eeac2b461b3acdbb3c3c19645 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

botanical · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 48 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.