Claim · model-written summary
The 8 t ha-1 target produced net returns of Rs. 80,565 and BC ratio 2.17.
- Taxon
- maize – wheat
Triticum aestivum
Zea mayst0 - Treatment
- targeted yield of 8 t ha-1e0
- Outcome
- net returns and higher BC ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- Rs. 80,565 and 2.17e0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“targeted yield of 8 t ha-1 (Rs. 80,565 and 2.17) were recorded maximum net returns and higher BC ratio respectively as compare to other treatments.”
t0“maize – wheat”
Title
Hiremath KA; Halepyati AS; Bellakki MA; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i2c.8766
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Intervention effect Maize and wheat growth and yield parameters at harvest were not influenced by tillage practices.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage with mulch gave relatively higher yield parameters than conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect Maize grain and stover yield did not differ significantly among tillage practices.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage with mulch produced 65.9 q ha-1 yield, more than zero tillage and conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect Maize growth and yield parameters differed significantly with nutrient management.
- Intervention effect The 10 t ha-1 target gave significantly higher maize growth and yield attributes than most treatments.
- Intervention effect Farmer nutrient management practice gave the lowest growth and yield attributes.
- Intervention effect The 10 t ha-1 target produced maize grain yield of 69.9 q ha-1, significantly higher than other approaches.
- Intervention effect The 10 t ha-1 target produced maize stover yield of 89.5 q ha-1, significantly higher than other approaches.
- Intervention effect Farmer practice had lowest maize grain yield of 53.6 q ha-1.
- Intervention effect Farmer practice had lowest maize stover yield of 74.3 q ha-1.
- Intervention effect Tillage by target yield interaction did not significantly affect maize grain and stover yield.
- Intervention effect Wheat growth and yield parameters did not differ with prior maize tillage and target yield approaches.
- Association Wheat maize equivalent yield and system productivity followed the maize yield trend.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage produced maximum net returns of Rs. 78,181 ha-1.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage with mulch produced net returns of Rs. 80,272 ha-1.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage achieved a BC ratio of 2.19.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage with mulch achieved a BC ratio of 2.18.
- Intervention effect The 10 t ha-1 target produced maximum net returns of Rs. 85,105 and BC ratio 2.18.