Observationmodel-written summary

Vitata fibres had a cell wall thickness of 4.57±1.36 µm.

A claim from Comparative analysis of fibre biometrics and morphological indices of the wood of two cultivars of Bambusa vulgaris Schrad. ex J.C.Wendl (‘Vitata’ and ‘Wamin’) · 2026

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitata fibres had a cell wall thickness of 4.57±1.36 µm.

Taxon
Bambusa vulgarisBambusa vulgarise1
Material
Vitatae2
Outcome
CWTe5
Value
4.57±1.36e5

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bambusa vulgaris
Bambusa vulgaris · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bambusa vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–115
e1

“We evaluated the fibre characteristics of two cultivars of Bambusa vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–436
e2

“The mean FL of the two cultivars (‘Vitata’ and ‘Wamin’) were 2.76±0.73 and 2.46±0.75 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1154
e5

“CWT (4.57±1.36 and 2.34±0.68 µm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1262

Title

Comparative analysis of fibre biometrics and morphological indices of the wood of two cultivars of Bambusa vulgaris Schrad. ex J.C.Wendl (‘Vitata’ and ‘Wamin’)

Adedeji Robert Ojo; Ifedayo Micheal Adeniyi Advances in Bamboo Science 2026. doi:10.1016/j.bamboo.2026.100251

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-ebcf296c2d1d5a029537113d7def8250da738250f8df41dcfad27f5d4cffa33f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer