Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Imazethapyr at 150 g a.i. ha was the weakest herbicide, with 80% efficacy.

A claim from Chemical control of field dodder in alfalfa · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr at 150 g a.i. ha was the weakest herbicide, with 80% efficacy.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
imazethapyr (150 g a.i. ha)e3
Interactor
field dodderCuscuta campestrist0parasite
Outcome
efficacye3
Direction
weakeste3
Value
80%e3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Cuscuta campestris
Cuscuta campestris · InteractorKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 11:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chemical control of field dodder in alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–43
e3

“while imazethapyr (150 g a.i. ha) was the weakest herbicide with 80% efficacy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1175

Title

Chemical control of field dodder in alfalfa

Marija Saric-Krsmanovic; Dragana Bozic; Goran Malidza; et al. Pesticidi i fitomedicina 2015. doi:10.2298/pif1502107s

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-ed46aa98fb78cbca293ecddd7864e300bf5ec373f00091ef10ad6d453b8907c0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Imazethapyr · Cuscuta campestris · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.