Method / resourcemodel-written summary

Calibration equations from odd-numbered samples predicted even-numbered samples for CP within a standard error of ± .95%.

A claim from Predicting Forage Quality by Infrared Replectance Spectroscopy · 1976

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calibration equations from odd-numbered samples predicted even-numbered samples for CP within a standard error of ± .95%.

Taxon
foragese0
Outcome
standard errore1
Value
± .95%e2
Qualifier
for CPe2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirection

Verbatim

e0

“samples of ground dry forages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–100
e1

“within a standard error”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1322
e2

“± .95% for CP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1339

Title

Predicting Forage Quality by Infrared Replectance Spectroscopy

K. H. Norris; R. F. Barnes; J. E. Moore; et al. Journal of Animal Science 1976. doi:10.2527/jas1976.434889x

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-eea993df461008a25b1cce7118ba0ad83347fd604987471ed4841dce40c9299e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer