Claim · model-written summary
Oat acid detergent fiber was greater after CS than HMC.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“ADF was greater for oats following CS compared to HMC (24.0 vs. 21.9, respectively; P < 0.01)”
t0“oats”
Title
Forage production and calf gains when grazing oats following corn harvest
McKenna M Brinton; Benjamin H Hansen; Kristen M Ulmer; et al. Translational Animal Science 2019. doi:10.1093/tas/txz046
Other claims from this paper (17)
- Intervention effect Oat biomass after corn silage exceeded that after high-moisture corn.
- Intervention effect Ground cover was higher after HMC than CS.
- Intervention effect Oat organic matter did not differ by preceding corn harvest.
- Intervention effect Oat crude protein was greater after HMC than CS.
- Intervention effect Oats after CS tended to have more neutral detergent fiber.
- Intervention effect Steers grazing oats after CS had greater ending body weight.
- Intervention effect Steers grazing after CS had greater daily gain.
- Intervention effect Gain per hectare was greater after CS than HMC.
- Intervention effect Soybean grain yield was higher after CS than HMC.
- Intervention effect Cover crop presence did not significantly change soybean grain yield.
- Intervention effect Corn treatment interacted with cover crop treatment for soybean yield.
- Intervention effect Ungrazed cover crops after CS reduced soybean yield.
- Intervention effect Grazing cover crops did not appear to affect subsequent soybean yield.
- Intervention effect Soybean stover yield was not affected by corn or DCAF treatments.
- Intervention effect Subsequent corn silage yield did not differ across treatments.
- Intervention effect Subsequent HMC grain yield did not differ across treatments.
- Intervention effect Subsequent HMC stover yield did not differ across treatments.