Claim · model-written summary
Fungus-by-lime interaction on vegetative growth was nonsignificant.
VitisNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The absence of significant interactions between the two factors of variability (fungi x lime concentration) on vegetative growth”
e1“grapevine susceptibility to calcium carbonate”
Title
VAM Fungi and Soil Lime Content Influence Rootstock Growth and Nutrient Content
Stefano Biricolti; Francesco Ferrini; Enrico Rinaldelli; et al. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 1997. doi:10.5344/ajev.1997.48.1.93
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect Mycorrhizal plants had greater root and shoot growth than uninoculated controls across lime contents.
- Intervention effect G. mosseae caused greater vegetative development than G. deserticola.
- Intervention effect G. constrictus caused greater vegetative development than G. deserticola.
- Association Plant growth declined as soil lime increased.
- Intervention effect Mycorrhization did not reduce grapevine susceptibility to calcium carbonate.
- Intervention effect Mycorrhizal inoculation increased leaf chlorosis.
- Association Leaf chlorosis incidence increased at higher lime rates.
- Intervention effect VAM reduced leaf chlorophyll content per mass.
- Association Leaf-area chlorophyll content was inversely correlated with lime concentration.
- Intervention effect Soil lime did not influence leaf mineral content except magnesium.
- Association Leaf magnesium decreased with higher lime concentration.
- Intervention effect Mycorrhizal inoculation influenced leaf P, Mn and B content.
- Intervention effect Mycorrhizal inoculation influenced leaf Zn and Cu content to a lesser extent.