Claim · model-written summary
In barley, the 1:1 treatment had 25% lower net benefits than the control.
- Taxon
- barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaree5 - Treatment
- l: l treatmente5
- Outcome
- net benefitse5
- Direction
- lowere5
- Value
- 25%e5
- Comparator
- controle5
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e5“four seasons of trials using barley ( Hordeum vulgare ) showed that the l: l treatment yielded 25% lower net benefits than the control”
Title
A. Rodríguez; N. A. Shah; M. Afzal; et al. Experimental Agriculture 1996. doi:10.1017/s0014479700026247
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect In wheat, the 1:1 treatment had 23% higher net benefits than the control.
- Intervention effect In wheat, the 2:1 treatment had 29% lower net benefits than the control.
- Intervention effect In wheat, the 1:1 treatment lowered gross revenue relative to the control.
- Intervention effect In wheat, the 1:1 treatment reduced total costs relative to the control.
- Intervention effect In barley, the 1:1 treatment increased the variation in net benefits by 4%.
- Intervention effect In barley, the 2:1 treatment had 36% lower net benefits than the control.
- Intervention effect In barley, the 2:1 treatment increased the variation in net benefits by 18%.
- Intervention effect Water-harvesting in valley floors is not a net yield-increasing technology for cereals.
- Intervention effect In wheat, the 1:1 treatment reduced the coefficient of variation by 19%.
- Intervention effect In wheat, the 2:1 treatment reduced the variation in net benefits by 8%.
- Recommendation Wheat grown in a 1:1 ratio of cropped to catchment area can increase farmers income and decrease its variation.
- Recommendation For barley, farmers are better off using their traditional management practice than creating water catchments.