Claim · model-written summary
No spray injury was observed.
- Outcome
- No spray injurye0
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“No spray injury was observed”
Title
Khalid Al-Absi Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2010
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Observation Thinning response varied by cultivar, chemicals and year.
- Observation Ace Spur Delicious was more responsive to chemical thinners.
- Observation Idared was difficult to thin.
- Intervention effect Combined ethephon and BA achieved adequate thinning without adverse effects in Ace Spur Delicious over two years.
- Intervention effect Ethephon with BA increased fruit weight in both cultivars.
- Intervention effect Ethephon with BA improved total soluble solids in both cultivars.
- Intervention effect The combination increased Ace Spur Delicious return bloom.
- Intervention effect The combination did not significantly influence fruit shape, seed number or firmness.
- Intervention effect Ethephon at 500 ppm without BA reliably thinned Ace Spur Delicious fruitlets.
- Intervention effect Ethephon at 500 ppm without BA increased Ace Spur Delicious return bloom.
- Intervention effect BA alone at 200 ppm did not significantly affect thinning, yield, fruit weight or shape in either cultivar.
- Intervention effect BA alone increased soluble solids in Ace Spur Delicious.
- Intervention effect BA alone decreased seed number in Ace Spur Delicious.
- Intervention effect Thinning treatments did not affect listed thinning, yield, fruit or bloom traits in Idared.
- Observation Results were acceptably reproducible between years.