Observationmodel-written summary

Ampelographic traits did not differentiate samples into the two major AFLP groups.

A claim from The characterisation of Vitis vinifera ’Refošk’ with AFLP and SSR molecular markers and ampelographic traits · 2014

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ampelographic traits did not differentiate samples into the two major AFLP groups.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae0
Outcome
differentiated among two major groupse3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“(Vitis vinifera L.) grown in Slovenia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–133
e3

“on the basis of ampelographic characterization samples were not differentiated among two major groups obtained with AFLP analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–887

Title

The characterisation of Vitis vinifera ’Refošk’ with AFLP and SSR molecular markers and ampelographic traits

Matjaž HLADNIK; Jernej JAKŠE; Dunja BANDELJ; et al. Acta agriculturae Slovenica 2014. doi:10.14720/aas.2014.103.1.06

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-efea42c91ebfe4efd4d0c251de95d490b47fa07d0c0349c37d52583a484c7414 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer