Claim · model-written summary
The optimal genotype varied with location and grouping.
- Taxon
- Populus deltoides
Populus deltoidese1 - Outcome
- optimum genotypee0
- Direction
- variede0
- Setting
- locatione0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The optimum genotype varied by location and grouping”
e1“Populus deltoides”
Title
G×E Analysis of Early Growth Traits of Populus deltoides in East China by Using BLUP-GGE
Zhengsai Yuan; Yufeng Dong; Ning Liu; et al. Forests 2022. doi:10.3390/f13111808
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Observation Diameter at breast height varied more than tree height at all sites.
- Observation Tree height repeatability exceeded diameter repeatability at all sites.
- Observation Tree height heritability exceeded diameter heritability at all sites.
- Method / resource BLUP-GGE fit for tree height was 93.72%.
- Method / resource BLUP-GGE fit for diameter at breast height was 92.22%.
- Method / resource Shanxian County divisions were the most powerful and representative among the three sites.
- Mechanism Genetic factors contributed to high variation in growth of five-year-old poplars.
- Recommendation Shanxian County was the most appropriate tested site for poplar growth.
- Recommendation Genotypes 16, 5, 21 and 7 were regarded as superior in East China.
- Recommendation Genotypes 8, 26 and 36 were best for Rizhao.
- Recommendation Genotypes 16, 5 and 21 were best for Shanxian.
- Recommendation Genotypes 22, 21 and 5 were best for Boxing.