Claim · model-written summary
Stripe rust developed at different rates in three wheat cultivars.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Interactor
- Puccinia striijormise1pathogen
- Outcome
- infectione0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“infection first developed in early December but developed at different rates in three cultivars”
e1“stripe rust (Puccinia striijormis) in wheat”
Title
SOME ASPECTS OF STRIPE RUST CONTROL IN SOUTHLAND
W. H. Risk; R.M. Beresford 1982
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Observation In unsprayed wheat plots, Tiritea was severely affected by stripe rust.
- Observation In unsprayed wheat plots, Kopara was slightly affected by stripe rust.
- Observation In unsprayed wheat plots, Karamu was affected very little by stripe rust.
- Intervention effect One, two, or three fungicide sprays significantly increased Tiritea yield.
- Intervention effect Spraying did not significantly increase Kopara yield.
- Intervention effect Spraying did not significantly increase Karamu yield.
- Intervention effect Spraying improved Tiritea thousand grain weight and grains per head.
- Intervention effect Late spraying gave variable results in Takahe and Tiritea.
- Intervention effect Under high infection, Tiritea responded significantly to spraying through late milk stage.
- Intervention effect At lower rust levels, spraying did not produce yield responses.
- Intervention effect At lower rust levels, spraying reduced leaf and head stripe rust incidence.