Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The optimal planting date increased soybean grain yield regardless of soil texture.

A claim from Agronomic performance of soybean with varied planting dates, row configurations, and seeding rates on two different soil textures · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal planting date increased soybean grain yield regardless of soil texture.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
optimal planting datee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
regardless of soil texturee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the optimal planting date increased soybean grain yield regardless of soil texture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1020

Title

Agronomic performance of soybean with varied planting dates, row configurations, and seeding rates on two different soil textures

F. Read Kelly; Jason A. Bond; Corey J. Bryant; et al. Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management 2024. doi:10.1002/cft2.70001

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-fa0d869b0132bc85d1aba643c95ad97af8b5d22987c8908d8fad00bb9b47624d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

sowing time · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

207 papers: 115 positive, 92 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this claim · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Mean soybean yields for the 15 July planting date were less than 50% of those of the April or May plantings.

    Soybean Response to Different Planting Patterns and Dates1,3 · 1982 · compared with April or May plantings

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
    Soybean seed yield in central Illinois decreased by an average of 33% as planting was delayed from early May to early July.

    Response of Determinate and Indeterminate Soybeans to varying Cultural Practices in the Northern USA1 · 1981 · compared with early May

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  3. negative
    Delayed planting reduced soybean grain yield.

    Effects of Planting Date on Two Soybean Cultivars: Seasonal Dry Matter Accumulation and Seed Yield1 · 1985

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  4. positive
    Early planting produced soybean yield equal to or above later planting, except once.

    Tillage, Row Spacing, and Planting Date Effects on Soybean following Corn or Wheat · 1992 · compared with planted later

    Same directionCited by this paper

  5. negative
    Delayed planting date reduced soybean seed yield by 0.01 to 0.04 Mg ha-1 per week, mainly in northern latitudes.

    Assessing Variation in US Soybean Seed Composition (Protein and Oil) · 2019

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Delayed planting reduced yield by 7–36% across cultivars.

    Potential of Early‐Maturing Soybean Cultivars in Late Plantings · 2000

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    There is potential for reduced soybean yields with delayed planting.

    Effect of Date of Preplant Tillage and Planting on Weed Populations and Mechanical Weed Control in Soybean (Glycine max) · 1996

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Row width and planting date did not affect profitability.

    Organically Managed No‐Tillage Rye–Soybean Systems: Agronomic, Economic, and Environmental Assessment · 2011

    Opposite direction

198 papers more in this group

See all 207 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.