Intervention effectmodel-written summary

H3- pusa hydrogel @ 5.0 kg ha-1 improved or extended grain weight ear⁻¹ in barley to 1.57 relative to other treatments.

A claim from Integrated Effects of Irrigation Scheduling, Pusa Hydrogel, and Foliar Micronutrients on Yield Attributes of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

H3- pusa hydrogel @ 5.0 kg ha-1 improved or extended grain weight ear⁻¹ in barley to 1.57 relative to other treatments.

Treatment
H3- pusa hydrogel @ 5.0 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
grain weight ear⁻¹e0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
1.57e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pooled results showed that irrigation I2- At Flag leaf stage & at Milking stage; H3- pusa hydrogel @ 5.0 kg ha-1 and M2-100 % RDF + 0.5 % Zn (foliar application at maximum vegetative stage and pre flowering) significantly improved yield attributes over other treatments respectively, increasing ears hill⁻¹ (7.30;7.31& 7.42), ears m⁻² (277.55 277.71 & 278.81), ear length (9.95 9.85 & 9.80 cm), total number of grains ear⁻¹ (41.36, 41.12 & 41.33), grain weight ear⁻¹ (1.57, 1.57 & 1.59g), and test weight (38.03, 38.19 & 38.45 g), while slightly extending days to 50 % flowering (93.83, 94.08 & 92.78 days) and raising unproductive tillers and tiller mortality modestly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–2162
t0

“Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–136

Title

Integrated Effects of Irrigation Scheduling, Pusa Hydrogel, and Foliar Micronutrients on Yield Attributes of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

Rajat Yadav; Sanjeev Kumar; M. Z. Siddiqui; et al. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports 2025. doi:10.9734/jsrr/2025/v31i113667

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-fa66fde836bbd9867ea6f8642f89a2fcb3ce5c2b85405c2e68a618d852a74b68 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

other · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.