Claim · model-written summary
In general the protein hydrolysate products Trainer and Siapton performed better than the seaweed products Maxicrop and Acadian.
- Treatment
- protein hydrolysate products, Trainer and Siaptone0
- Outcome
- performed bettere0
- Direction
- performed bettere0
- Comparator
- seaweed products (Maxicrop and Acadian)e0
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“In general, the protein hydrolysate products, Trainer and Siapton, performed better than the seaweed products (Maxicrop and Acadian)”
Title
Effect of different biostimulants and application methods and their affects on ornamentals
Wooten, Abbie SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University) 2025
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Some biostimulants increased calibrachoa growth and quality, in terms of greenness, compared with the control.
- Intervention effect On Penta Falling Star, the protein hydrolysate Siapton outperformed the seaweed product Acadian, but this depended heavily on watering method and time.
- Intervention effect Watering time had a significant effect, with watering at both 10 AM and 2 PM consistently producing the best quality plants.
- Intervention effect Hand watering consistently produced the worst quality plants.
- Intervention effect For rooting of cuttings, nothing significant was found for most products and species overall.
- Intervention effect A significant interaction of dip time on root development scores was found only for Weigela Sonic Red dipped for 30 minutes, which produced the greatest number of roots.
- Intervention effect All other treatments and dip times had no significant effect on the rooting of cuttings of Annabelle.
- Intervention effect All other treatments and dip times had no significant effect on the rooting of cuttings of viburnum Eskimo.