Claim · model-written summary
The authors concluded that local inoculum 1 was more effective than commercial inoculum 2.
- Treatment
- Local inoculum 1e0
- Outcome
- effectivee0
- Direction
- more effectivee0
- Comparator
- commercial inoculum 2e0
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“Local inoculum 1 was more effective than commercial inoculum 2.”
Title
Voko Bi Rosin Don Rodrigue; Konan Adjoua Estelle; Kouassi Kouassi Clément; et al. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 2021. doi:10.9734/jeai/2021/v43i1130759
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Mycorrhized seedlings had 100% survival versus 90% in controls.
- Observation Root mycorrhizal intensity was 19.21% with local inoculum 1.
- Observation Root mycorrhizal intensity was 10.40% with commercial inoculum 2.
- Intervention effect Local inoculum 1 produced the highest seedling phosphorus content, 0.3 ppm.
- Intervention effect Local inoculum 1 produced the highest seedling nitrogen content, 2.6%.
- Intervention effect Seedlings receiving inoculum 1 grew faster than those under the other two treatments.
- Recommendation The authors suggest local mycorrhizal inocula for restoration with P. macrocarpa seedlings.