Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Auger applied herbicides were as effective as rotary drum seed treater application.

A claim from Cheat (Bromus secalinus) Control with Herbicides Applied to Mature Seeds1 · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Auger applied herbicides were as effective as rotary drum seed treater application.

Treatment
Herbicides applied with a sprayer-equipped augere1
Interactor
cheatBromus secalinuse1weed
Outcome
as effectivee0
Direction
as effectivee0
Comparator
herbicides applied with a rotary drum seed-treatere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bromus secalinus
Bromus secalinus · InteractorKurt Stüber [1] · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were as effective as herbicides applied with a rotary drum seed-treater”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–643
e1

“Herbicides applied with a sprayer-equipped auger reduced cheat emergence >90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–567
e2

“during the wheat harvesting process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–198

Title

Cheat (Bromus secalinus) Control with Herbicides Applied to Mature Seeds1

AMANDA E. STONE; THOMAS F. PEEPER; JOHN B. SOLIE Weed Technology 2001. doi:10.1614/0890-037x(2001)015[0382:cbscwh]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-fdc4cdece2fd74e8e3c7feab118117bf38b19d38e3e9e4c74893d3fd075b9228 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

herbicide · Bromus secalinus · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
See all 5 papers →

application · Bromus secalinus · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.