Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Plants in the MC early planting averaged 0.11 less height than control plots; not statistically significant.

A claim from Cotton Response to Planting Date and Mepiquat Chloride · 1988

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants in the MC early planting averaged 0.11 less height than control plots; not statistically significant.

Treatment
MC earlye0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
lesse0
Value
0.11e0
Comparator
control plotse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The MC early, intermediate‐, and late‐planting plots averaged 0.11, 0.25, and 0.30 less height, respectively, than the control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1609
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6

Title

Cotton Response to Planting Date and Mepiquat Chloride

George W. Cathey; William R. Meredith Agronomy Journal 1988. doi:10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000030014x

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-ffebf42c4e5a76c4c57400e5d755d31714f7ae0853d534d5a59c9292687cf0c6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 16 in the model’s answer

mepiquat chloride · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 38 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

chloride · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 40 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.