Photorhabdus 5 claims

genus · family Morganellaceae · bacterium · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

3 spellings

Photorhabdus
PhotorhabdusElizabeth Gerdes1, Devang Upadhyay, Sivanadane Mandjiny, Rebecca Bullard-Dillard, Meredith Storms, Michael Menefee, Leonard D. Holmes · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MANGO3 BACTERIA (Photorhabdus sp.) reduced soil population of Meloidogyne incognita by up to 99.5% compared with the check.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae1
Treatment
MANGO3 BACTERIA (Photorhabdus sp.)e3
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Second interactor
Photorhabdus sp.Photorhabduse3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
soil populatione3
Direction
reductione3
Value
99.5 %e3
Comparator
checke3
Setting
Greenhouse Conditionst1

Verbatim

t1

“under Greenhouse Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–125
e1

“Ten entomopathogenic nematode (EPN) strains, five different types of bacteria, oils and nematicide (Vydate) were tested in pots for their antagonistic effects against Meloidogyne incognita (galling, egg masses production and soil population) on eggplant plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–260
e3

“EPNs and Photorhabdus bacterium decreased soil population up to 99.6 % when treated with S. arenarium (S.RIO) and 99.2 % reduction occurred by H. indica (3 MANGO) treatment and up to 99.5 % soil population reduction in MANGO3 BACTERIA (Photorhabdus sp.) compared to the check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–958

Title

Biocontrol of Meloidogyne incognita Using Entomopathogenic Nematodes and their Symbiotic Bacteria under Greenhouse Conditions

Noha Mohamed Alaa Abu Shady; Shaimaa Fathy Abd Elrahman Diab Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Sciences /Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2025. doi:10.21608/ejarc.2025.450925

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortia treatment T9 gave significantly higher biocontrol efficiency, 85-90%, against Helicoverpa armigera in all solanaceous vegetable crops.

Taxon
solanaceous vegetable cropse0
Treatment
Consortiae1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Second interactor
Photorhabdus and XenorhabdusXenorhabdusPhotorhabduse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
biocontrol efficiencye1
Direction
highere1
Value
85-90%e1
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“biocontrol potential of symbiotic bacteria, Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus against the shoot and fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera in solanaceous vegetable crops grown under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 46–239
e1

“The results had shown significantly higher biocontrol efficiency in the treatment T9 (H. armigera + Consortia) with 85-90% biocontrol efficiency in all the vegetable crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–600

Title

In vitro evaluation of biocontrol potential of symbiotic bacteria of entomopathogenic nematodes against shoot and fruit borer (Helicoverpa armigera) in Solanaceous vegetable crops grown in seedling trays under greenhouse condition

S Adithya; MK Shivaprakash; K Harish Kumar International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i6ab.11049

Other claims from this paper (3)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual strains EPB3 and EPB1 (treatments T3 and T2) gave 75-80% biocontrol potential and were at par with each other.

Taxon
solanaceous vegetable cropse0
Treatment
EPB3 and EPB1e2
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Second interactor
Photorhabdus and XenorhabdusXenorhabdusPhotorhabduse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
biocontrol potentiale2
Direction
at pare2
Value
75-80%e2
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“biocontrol potential of symbiotic bacteria, Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus against the shoot and fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera in solanaceous vegetable crops grown under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 46–239
e2

“T3 and T2 which received EPB3 and EPB1 with 75-80% biocontrol potential and are at par with each other”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–844

Title

In vitro evaluation of biocontrol potential of symbiotic bacteria of entomopathogenic nematodes against shoot and fruit borer (Helicoverpa armigera) in Solanaceous vegetable crops grown in seedling trays under greenhouse condition

S Adithya; MK Shivaprakash; K Harish Kumar International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i6ab.11049

Other claims from this paper (3)
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend testing these entomopathogenic bacteria in field trials and developing them as bio-pesticide formulations for integrated pest management.

Taxon
solanaceous vegetable cropse0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Second interactor
Photorhabdus and XenorhabdusXenorhabdusPhotorhabduse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
bio-pesticide formulationse4
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“biocontrol potential of symbiotic bacteria, Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus against the shoot and fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera in solanaceous vegetable crops grown under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 46–239
e4

“these entomopathogenic bacteria can be tested for their effectivity under field trails and can be developed as bio-pesticide formulations either in the form of individual application or in integrated pest management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1234

Title

In vitro evaluation of biocontrol potential of symbiotic bacteria of entomopathogenic nematodes against shoot and fruit borer (Helicoverpa armigera) in Solanaceous vegetable crops grown in seedling trays under greenhouse condition

S Adithya; MK Shivaprakash; K Harish Kumar International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i6ab.11049

Other claims from this paper (3)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus were more effective in influencing root-knot nematode life cycles.

Treatment
Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus spp.e0
Interactor
RKNse0pest
Second interactor
Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus spp.XenorhabdusPhotorhabduse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
life cycle of RKNse0
Direction
more effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus spp., isolated from Steinernema asiaticum and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, were proved more effective in influencing the life cycle of RKNs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–775
t0

“brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–125

Title

Evaluation of persistence and effectiveness of bacterial cell suspensions and culture filtrates againstM. incognitaon brinjal

H.M. Aatif; N. Javed; S.A. Khan; et al. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 2014. doi:10.1080/03235408.2014.880571

Other claims from this paper (4)