By interacting organism › Fungi › Nectriaceae › Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium wilt did not induce hypermethylation at site 3, and chickpea remained vulnerable.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Interactor: Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicerisFusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicerise0pathogen
Outcome: remained vulnerablee0

Verbatim

e0
“but Fusarium wilt [Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris (Foc)] did not and the chickpea plants remained vulnerable to the disease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–634

Title

DNA Methylation of MYB Sites of Chickpea CabHLH92 During Salt Stress and Fusarium Wilt Under Influence of Trichoderma asperellum T42

Nidhi Rai; Shashi Pandey Rai; Birinchi Kumar Sarma Physiologia Plantarum 2026. doi:10.1111/ppl.70958

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Salt stress induced hypermethylation at MYB binding site 3.
Intervention effect T42 induced demethylation at two MYB binding sites under Foc stress.
Association T42-associated demethylation was positively associated with chickpea wilt tolerance.
Intervention effect Salt stress enhanced CabHLH92 expression.
Intervention effect Salt stress reduced CaMYB78 expression.
Observation Under Fusarium wilt and T42, expression of CabHLH92 and CaMYB78 reversed relative to salt stress.
Mechanism T42-induced demethylation facilitated CaMYB78 binding to CabHLH92.
Mechanism T42-induced demethylation positively affected CaMYB78 expression.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.5 mg/L, priming reduced Fusarium wilt severity to 32.5% from 63% in infected controls.

Taxon: ChickpeaCicer arietinume2
Treatment: 0.5 mg/Le0
Interactor: Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicerisFusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicerise1pathogen
Outcome: Disease severitye0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 32.5%e0
Qualifier: 63%e0
Comparator: infected controle0

Verbatim

e0
“Disease severity decreased from 63% in infected control to 32.5% at 0.5 mg/L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1227

e1
“Fusarium wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–148

e2
“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–50

Title

Green-synthesized cobalt oxide nanoparticles for seed nanopriming enhance chickpea growth and suppress fusarium wilt

Sadaf Anwaar; Ayesha Arif; Muneeba Naseem; et al. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture 2026. doi:10.1186/s40538-026-00991-3

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect At 0.5 mg/L, nanopriming increased shoot and root length versus water control.
Intervention effect At 0.7 mg/L, nanopriming produced the highest growth response.
Intervention effect At 0.7 mg/L, priming reduced Fusarium wilt severity to 27.5% from 63% in infected controls.
Observation At 0.7 mg/L, nanoparticles produced an 18.5 ± 0.5 mm fungal inhibition zone.
Observation At 0.5 mg/L, nanoparticles produced a 17.0 ± 0.5 mm fungal inhibition zone.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.7 mg/L, priming reduced Fusarium wilt severity to 27.5% from 63% in infected controls.

Taxon: ChickpeaCicer arietinume2
Treatment: 0.7 mg/Le0
Interactor: Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicerisFusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicerise1pathogen
Outcome: Disease severitye0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 27.5%e0
Qualifier: 63%e0
Comparator: infected controle0

Verbatim

e0
“Disease severity decreased from 63% in infected control to 32.5% at 0.5 mg/L and 27.5% at 0.7 mg/L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1249

e1
“Fusarium wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–148

e2
“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–50

Title

Green-synthesized cobalt oxide nanoparticles for seed nanopriming enhance chickpea growth and suppress fusarium wilt

Sadaf Anwaar; Ayesha Arif; Muneeba Naseem; et al. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture 2026. doi:10.1186/s40538-026-00991-3

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect At 0.5 mg/L, nanopriming increased shoot and root length versus water control.
Intervention effect At 0.7 mg/L, nanopriming produced the highest growth response.
Intervention effect At 0.5 mg/L, priming reduced Fusarium wilt severity to 32.5% from 63% in infected controls.
Observation At 0.7 mg/L, nanoparticles produced an 18.5 ± 0.5 mm fungal inhibition zone.
Observation At 0.5 mg/L, nanoparticles produced a 17.0 ± 0.5 mm fungal inhibition zone.

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The control versus infected comparison at seven days yielded 894 significant differentially expressed genes.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinume2
Organ / stage: seedling rootse2
Interactor: Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicerisFusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicerist0pathogen
Outcome: significant DEGse0
Value: 894e0
Comparator: C_7 vs S_7e1

Verbatim

e0
“a total of 894, 867, and 535 significant DEGs respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–695

e1
“C_7 vs S_7 and C_12 vs S_12”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–308

e2
“chickpea seedling roots exposed to fungal infection”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–155

t0
“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–163

Title

Computational studies deciphered the role of key genes and associated networks regulating the defense mechanism in chickpea under Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris induced wilt condition

Anjali Chaudhary; Annamalai Arunachalam; P. T. V. Lakshmi Plant Signaling & Behavior 2026. doi:10.1080/15592324.2026.2631915

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The control versus infected comparison at twelve days yielded 867 significant differentially expressed genes.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinume2
Interactor: Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicerisFusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicerist0pathogen
Outcome: significant DEGse0
Value: 867e0
Comparator: C_12 vs S_12e1

Verbatim

e0
“a total of 894, 867, and 535 significant DEGs respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–695

e1
“C_12 vs S_12”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–308

e2
“chickpea seedling roots exposed to fungal infection”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–155

t0
“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–163

Title

Computational studies deciphered the role of key genes and associated networks regulating the defense mechanism in chickpea under Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris induced wilt condition

Anjali Chaudhary; Annamalai Arunachalam; P. T. V. Lakshmi Plant Signaling & Behavior 2026. doi:10.1080/15592324.2026.2631915

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The infected seven versus twelve day comparison yielded 535 significant differentially expressed genes.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinume2
Interactor: Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicerisFusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicerist0pathogen
Outcome: significant DEGse0
Value: 535e0
Comparator: S_7 vs S_12e1

Verbatim

e0
“a total of 894, 867, and 535 significant DEGs respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–695

e1
“S_7 vs S_12”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–369

e2
“chickpea seedling roots exposed to fungal infection”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–155

t0
“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–163

Title

Computational studies deciphered the role of key genes and associated networks regulating the defense mechanism in chickpea under Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris induced wilt condition

Anjali Chaudhary; Annamalai Arunachalam; P. T. V. Lakshmi Plant Signaling & Behavior 2026. doi:10.1080/15592324.2026.2631915

Other claims from this paper (7)

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early infection hub genes were associated with chloroplast reactive oxygen species scavenging.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Interactor: Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicerisFusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicerist0pathogen
Gene: hub genese0
Outcome: chloroplast-localized reactive oxygen species scavenging activitye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“hub genes associated with chloroplast-localized reactive oxygen species scavenging activity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1039

e1
“chickpea seedling roots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–127

t0
“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–163

Title

Computational studies deciphered the role of key genes and associated networks regulating the defense mechanism in chickpea under Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris induced wilt condition

Anjali Chaudhary; Annamalai Arunachalam; P. T. V. Lakshmi Plant Signaling & Behavior 2026. doi:10.1080/15592324.2026.2631915

Other claims from this paper (7)

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glycosyl hydrolase 28 was implicated during early infection.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Interactor: Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicerisFusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicerist0pathogen
Gene: glycosyl hydrolase 28 (GH28)e0
Outcome: involved during the early phase of infectione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“glycosyl hydrolase 28 (GH28), to be involved during the early phase of infection”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1145

e1
“chickpea seedling roots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–127

t0
“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–163

Title

Computational studies deciphered the role of key genes and associated networks regulating the defense mechanism in chickpea under Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris induced wilt condition

Anjali Chaudhary; Annamalai Arunachalam; P. T. V. Lakshmi Plant Signaling & Behavior 2026. doi:10.1080/15592324.2026.2631915

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ochrobactrum quorumnocens inhibited Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris on PDA by 36.29%.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinume2
Interactor: Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicerisFusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicerise2pathogen
Second interactor: Ochrobactrum quorumnocensOchrobactrum quorumnocense1biocontrol_agent
Outcome: inhibition of FOCe0
Direction: inhibitione0
Value: 36.29%e0
Setting: potato dextrose agar (PDA)e0

Verbatim

e0
“These isolates exhibited significant inhibition of FOC on potato dextrose agar (PDA), with inhibition percentages of 36.29%, 48.48%, 45.89%, 57.37%, and 55.50%, respectively.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1150

e1
“The selected isolates were identified as Ochrobactrum quorumnocens, Bacillus velezensis, Alcaligenes faecalis, Bacillus subtilis , and Acinetobacter schindleri .”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–975

e2
“Fusarium wilt of chickpea, caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris (FOC)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–89

Title

Biocontrol potential of endophytic bacteria against Fusarium wilt pathogen (Fusariumoxysporum f. sp. ciceris) in chickpea

Jonnada Likhita; Meenakshi Arya; Yashowardhan Singh; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2026. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2026.1787705

Other claims from this paper (14)

Observation Bacillus velezensis inhibited Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris on PDA by 48.48%.
Observation Alcaligenes faecalis inhibited Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris on PDA by 45.89%.
Observation Bacillus subtilis inhibited Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris on PDA by 57.37%.
Observation Acinetobacter schindleri inhibited Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris on PDA by 55.50%.
Intervention effect Ochrobactrum quorumnocens reduced chickpea Fusarium wilt incidence in the field.
Intervention effect Ochrobactrum quorumnocens enhanced chickpea growth in the field.
Intervention effect Bacillus velezensis reduced chickpea Fusarium wilt incidence in the field.
Intervention effect Bacillus velezensis enhanced chickpea growth in the field.
Intervention effect Alcaligenes faecalis reduced chickpea Fusarium wilt incidence in the field.
Intervention effect Alcaligenes faecalis enhanced chickpea growth in the field.
Intervention effect Bacillus subtilis reduced chickpea Fusarium wilt incidence in the field.
Intervention effect Bacillus subtilis enhanced chickpea growth in the field.
Intervention effect Acinetobacter schindleri reduced chickpea Fusarium wilt incidence in the field.
Intervention effect Acinetobacter schindleri enhanced chickpea growth in the field.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus velezensis inhibited Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris on PDA by 48.48%.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinume2
Interactor: Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicerisFusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicerise2pathogen
Second interactor: Bacillus velezensisBacillus velezensise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome: inhibition of FOCe0
Direction: inhibitione0
Value: 48.48%e0
Setting: potato dextrose agar (PDA)e0

Verbatim

e0
“These isolates exhibited significant inhibition of FOC on potato dextrose agar (PDA), with inhibition percentages of 36.29%, 48.48%, 45.89%, 57.37%, and 55.50%, respectively.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1150

e1
“The selected isolates were identified as Ochrobactrum quorumnocens, Bacillus velezensis, Alcaligenes faecalis, Bacillus subtilis , and Acinetobacter schindleri .”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–975

e2
“Fusarium wilt of chickpea, caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris (FOC)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–89

Title

Biocontrol potential of endophytic bacteria against Fusarium wilt pathogen (Fusariumoxysporum f. sp. ciceris) in chickpea

Jonnada Likhita; Meenakshi Arya; Yashowardhan Singh; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2026. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2026.1787705

Other claims from this paper (14)

Observation Ochrobactrum quorumnocens inhibited Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris on PDA by 36.29%.
Observation Alcaligenes faecalis inhibited Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris on PDA by 45.89%.
Observation Bacillus subtilis inhibited Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris on PDA by 57.37%.
Observation Acinetobacter schindleri inhibited Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris on PDA by 55.50%.
Intervention effect Ochrobactrum quorumnocens reduced chickpea Fusarium wilt incidence in the field.
Intervention effect Ochrobactrum quorumnocens enhanced chickpea growth in the field.
Intervention effect Bacillus velezensis reduced chickpea Fusarium wilt incidence in the field.
Intervention effect Bacillus velezensis enhanced chickpea growth in the field.
Intervention effect Alcaligenes faecalis reduced chickpea Fusarium wilt incidence in the field.
Intervention effect Alcaligenes faecalis enhanced chickpea growth in the field.
Intervention effect Bacillus subtilis reduced chickpea Fusarium wilt incidence in the field.
Intervention effect Bacillus subtilis enhanced chickpea growth in the field.
Intervention effect Acinetobacter schindleri reduced chickpea Fusarium wilt incidence in the field.
Intervention effect Acinetobacter schindleri enhanced chickpea growth in the field.

Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris 491 claims

491 claims