Paper · 2009 · Current Science

Overlap index: a measure to assess flowering synchrony among teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f) clones in seed orchards.

Rajesh Gunaga; R. Vasudeva

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

One of the most important aspects in a seed orchard is the synchrony among the clones for reproductive phenology. This will decide the extent of random mating among the constituent clones and hence the genetic gain in the resultant progeny. In the present study, synchrony among clones for flowering and peak flowering was estimated through the phenogram as well as through a novel overlap index. Rating of an entire orchard for its relative degree of flowering synchronization is effective with this new measure. The present study was conducted in teak clonal seed orchard (CSO), Manchikere, Karnataka using 25 clones to study the clonal variation for flowering phenology. There are two peak periods in flowering. The first period during early May to July corresponds mainly to the clones of central and southern origin; the second period during July to August corresponding to those of northern origin. Further, these two peaks are also more apparent considering the peak flowering periods of clones. Perhaps, this is the first empirical evidence among the CSOs of teak in India where asynchrony has been documented and quantified through meticulous observations as well as by developing a new index.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The overlap index effectively rated orchard flowering synchrony.

Taxon
teakt0
Outcome
relative degree of flowering synchronizatione0
Comparator
new measuree0

Verbatim

e0

“Rating of an entire orchard for its relative degree of flowering synchronization is effective with this new measure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–512 · show in text ↑
t0

“teak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Teak flowering had two peak periods.

Taxon
teakt0
Outcome
two peak periods in floweringe0

Verbatim

e0

“There are two peak periods in flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–713 · show in text ↑
t0

“teak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clones of central and southern origin flowered mainly in early May to July.

Taxon
teakt0
Material
clones of central and southern origine0
Outcome
first period during early May to Julye0

Verbatim

e0

“The first period during early May to July corresponds mainly to the clones of central and southern origin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“teak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clones of northern origin flowered mainly in July to August.

Taxon
teakt0
Material
those of northern origine0
Outcome
second period during July to Auguste0

Verbatim

e0

“the second period during July to August corresponding to those of northern origin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“teak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two flowering peaks were more apparent using peak flowering periods.

Taxon
teakt0
Outcome
two peaks are also more apparente0
Qualifier
peak flowering periods of clonese0

Verbatim

e0

“these two peaks are also more apparent considering the peak flowering periods of clones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“teak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering asynchrony was documented and quantified in the teak clonal seed orchard.

Taxon
teakt0
Outcome
asynchronye0
Value
new indexe0

Verbatim

e0

“asynchrony has been documented and quantified through meticulous observations as well as by developing a new index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“teak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑