Paper · 2009 · Munis entomology & zoology

BIONOMICS OF CENOPALPUS IRANI, BRYOBIA RUBRIOCULUS AND THEIR EGG PREDATOR ZETZELLIA MALI (ACARI:TENUIPALPIDAE, TETRANYCHIDAE, STIGMAEIDAE) IN NATURAL CONDITIONS

Maryam Darbemamieh; Karim Kamali; Yaghoub Fathipour

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
13
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Bionomics of Cenopalpus irani Dosse and Bryobia rubrioculus Scheuten and their egg predator Zetzellia mali (Ewing) was studied in Kermanshah (west of Iran) from 31st May till 7th November 2007 on apple leaves and interaction (density dependence) between phytophagous mites and their predator were determined. The reliable sample size (number of leaves) with maximum variation of 5.33% was about 130. Index of dispersion, regression models (Taylor and Iwao), Morisita's index and Lloyd's mean crowding to mean were used to estimate spatial distribution pattern of these mites. The results indicated that the highest population density of C. irani, B. rubrioculus and Z. mali was in 19th August (13.45 per leaf), 9th August (0.615 per leaf) and 9th August (1.161 per leaf), respectively. Index of dispersion, regression models (Taylor and Iwao), Morisita's index and Lloyd's mean crowding to mean showed an aggregated distribution for all species. The linear regression between predator and preys population densities showed a density-dependant predation by Z. mali on C. irani and B. rubrioculus. Spatial distribution parameters of tetranychoid mites and their predator can be used to outline a sampling program, estimate population density of these mites and efficiency of the predator for using in orchards IPM.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest population density of Cenopalpus irani on apple leaves was 13.45 per leaf, in 19th August.

Interactor
C. iranie1pest
Outcome
highest population densitye1
Value
13.45 per leafe1
Qualifier
19th Auguste1
Setting
Kermanshah (west of Iran)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was studied in Kermanshah (west of Iran) from 31st May till 7th November 2007 on apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest population density of C. irani, B. rubrioculus and Z. mali was in 19th August (13.45 per leaf), 9th August (0.615 per leaf) and 9th August (1.161 per leaf), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–784 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest population density of Bryobia rubrioculus on apple leaves was 0.615 per leaf, on 9th August.

Interactor
B. rubrioculusBryobia rubrioculuse1pest
Outcome
highest population densitye1
Value
0.615 per leafe1
Qualifier
9th Auguste1
Setting
Kermanshah (west of Iran)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bryobia rubrioculus
Bryobia rubrioculus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was studied in Kermanshah (west of Iran) from 31st May till 7th November 2007 on apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest population density of C. irani, B. rubrioculus and Z. mali was in 19th August (13.45 per leaf), 9th August (0.615 per leaf) and 9th August (1.161 per leaf), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–784 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest population density of the predator Zetzellia mali on apple leaves was 1.161 per leaf, on 9th August.

Interactor
Z. maliZetzellia malie1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
highest population densitye1
Value
1.161 per leafe1
Qualifier
9th Auguste1
Setting
Kermanshah (west of Iran)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was studied in Kermanshah (west of Iran) from 31st May till 7th November 2007 on apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest population density of C. irani, B. rubrioculus and Z. mali was in 19th August (13.45 per leaf), 9th August (0.615 per leaf) and 9th August (1.161 per leaf), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–784 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three species showed an aggregated spatial distribution on apple leaves.

Outcome
aggregated distributione2
Qualifier
for all speciese2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was studied in Kermanshah (west of Iran) from 31st May till 7th November 2007 on apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–208 · show in text ↑
e2

“Index of dispersion, regression models (Taylor and Iwao), Morisita's index and Lloyd's mean crowding to mean showed an aggregated distribution for all species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–944 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z. mali showed density-dependent predation on C. irani and B. rubrioculus.

Interactor
C. iranie3pest
Second interactor
Z. maliZetzellia malie3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
density-dependant predatione3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was studied in Kermanshah (west of Iran) from 31st May till 7th November 2007 on apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–208 · show in text ↑
e3

“The linear regression between predator and preys population densities showed a density-dependant predation by Z. mali on C. irani and B. rubrioculus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1094 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest the spatial distribution parameters can be used to outline a sampling program for these mites.

Outcome
sampling programe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was studied in Kermanshah (west of Iran) from 31st May till 7th November 2007 on apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–208 · show in text ↑
e4

“Spatial distribution parameters of tetranychoid mites and their predator can be used to outline a sampling program”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1210 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reliable sample size on apple leaves was about 130 leaves, with maximum variation of 5.33%.

Outcome
reliable sample sizee5
Value
about 130e5
Qualifier
maximum variation of 5.33%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was studied in Kermanshah (west of Iran) from 31st May till 7th November 2007 on apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–208 · show in text ↑
e5

“The reliable sample size (number of leaves) with maximum variation of 5.33% was about 130”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–398 · show in text ↑