Paper · 1979

Wheat plant composition: varietal differences in physical composition, chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of various plant parts

De La Llata Coronado; José Luís Pérez Alejo

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Whole plant samples were obtained at grain maturity from nine wheat varieties. . Plants were physically separated into grain, stems, leaves and non-grain portions of the spike. Plant fractions were analyzed for in'vitro dry matter disappearance and chemical composition. Across varieties, grain and non-grain fractions averaged 41 and 59% respec­ tively, and varietal differences were observed in leaf and grain fractions as a percent of the entire plant. Differ­ ences due to variety were observed in in vitro dry matter disappearance and most chemical components of leaves and stems. In a field study conducted in Mexico, grain was esti­ mated to account for 37% of the dry matter produced and only 33% of the non-grain residue was recovered as baled straw. Separation of baled straw indicated a higher percentage of stems (60%) and lower content of non-grain spikes (12%) than was found in hand-harvested residue. The variation in physical and chemical composition and particularly in in vitro dry matter disappearance of leaves and stems among the small sample of wheat varieties investigated in this study indicates that quality differences in wheat straw do exist. It would appear that straws with improved feeding value could be identified or developed without necessarily decreasing grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain averaged 41% across varieties.

Organ / stage
graine0
Outcome
grain fractione0
Value
41e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Across varieties, grain and non-grain fractions averaged 41 and 59% respec­ tively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–353 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-grain fractions averaged 59% across varieties.

Organ / stage
non-graine0
Outcome
non-grain fractionse0
Value
59%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Across varieties, grain and non-grain fractions averaged 41 and 59% respec­ tively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–353 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and grain fractions differed among varieties.

Outcome
leaf and grain fractionse0
Direction
differencese0

Not reportedTaxonMaterial

Verbatim

e0

“varietal differences were observed in leaf and grain fractions as a percent of the entire plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–454 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and stem digestibility and chemical components differed by variety.

Material
varietye0
Outcome
in vitro dry matter disappearance and most chemical components of leaves and stemse0
Direction
Differ­ encese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Differ­ ences due to variety were observed in in vitro dry matter disappearance and most chemical components of leaves and stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–584 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain accounted for an estimated 37% of produced dry matter in Mexico.

Organ / stage
graine0
Outcome
dry matter producede0
Value
37%e0
Setting
Mexicoe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In a field study conducted in Mexico, grain was esti­ mated to account for 37% of the dry matter produced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–691 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only 33% of non-grain residue was recovered as baled straw.

Outcome
non-grain residue was recovered as baled strawe0
Value
33%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“only 33% of the non-grain residue was recovered as baled straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–758 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baled straw had a higher stem proportion of 60% than hand-harvested residue.

Organ / stage
stemse0
Outcome
percentage of stemse0
Direction
highere0
Value
60%e0
Comparator
hand-harvested residuee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“a higher percentage of stems (60%) and lower content of non-grain spikes (12%) than was found in hand-harvested residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–915 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baled straw had a lower non-grain spike content of 12% than hand-harvested residue.

Organ / stage
non-grain spikese0
Outcome
content of non-grain spikese0
Direction
lowere0
Value
12%e0
Comparator
hand-harvested residuee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“a higher percentage of stems (60%) and lower content of non-grain spikes (12%) than was found in hand-harvested residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–915 · show in text ↑