Paper · 2009 · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)

PLANT COMMUNITY RESPONSE TO TAMARISK INVASION AND HYDROLOGIC REGIME IN THE CATARACT CANYON, CANYONLANDS NATIONAL PARK: A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION

Mortenson, Susan G; Weisberg, Peter J

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In the southwestern US, the composition and abundance of riparian plants has changed as a result of flow regime alteration and the invasion of Tamarix. We investigated trends in vegetation dynamics along the Green and Colorado Rivers in Canyonlands National Park (CNP) from 1976 to 2008 through historical aerial photo analyses. We also explored the relationships between understory and overstory species in riparian habitat of CNP. The effects of river regulation on seedling establishment patterns were assessed in slightly regulated, moderately regulated, and extremely regulated river sections in the southwestern US. Tamarix dominated the overstory vegetation in all river sections in CNP but was less dominant along the Colorado (73% vs. 83%-86% for the Green and Cataract sections). Overstory-understory relationships were generally quite weak, although species commonly found with Tamarix included Bromus tectorum, Distichlis spicata, and Sporobolus spp. Seedlings of Tamarix and Salix exigua were abundant, with the latter being far more abundant than below the Glen Canyon Dam in Grand Canyon. However, seedlings of Populus fremontii and Salix gooddingii were rare. Apparent differences in the affinities of Tamarix and Salix exigua for certain soil characteristics including pH, conductivity, and relative concentration of ammonium are difficult to interpret without complementary experimental studies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tamarix dominated the overstory in all CNP river sections but less along the Colorado than Green and Cataract sections.

Taxon
TamarixTamarixe0
Outcome
overstory vegetatione0
Direction
less dominante0
Value
73%e0
Qualifier
83%-86%e0
Setting
Coloradoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tamarix
Tamarix · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryBernard DUPONT from FRANCE · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tamarix dominated the overstory vegetation in all river sections in CNP but was less dominant along the Colorado (73% vs. 83%-86% for the Green and Cataract sections)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–788 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overstory–understory relationships were generally weak.

Taxon
PLANT COMMUNITYt0
Organ / stage
understorye0
Outcome
Overstory-understory relationshipse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Overstory-understory relationships were generally quite weak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“PLANT COMMUNITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bromus tectorum, Distichlis spicata and Sporobolus spp. commonly occurred with Tamarix.

Taxon
TamarixTamarixe0
Interactor
Bromus tectorumBromus tectorume0other
Second interactor
Distichlis spicataDistichlis spicatae0other
Outcome
species commonly found with Tamarixe0
Qualifier
Sporobolus spp.e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tamarix
Tamarix · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryBernard DUPONT from FRANCE · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bromus tectorum
Bromus tectorum · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Distichlis spicata
Distichlis spicata · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“species commonly found with Tamarix included Bromus tectorum, Distichlis spicata, and Sporobolus spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–962 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tamarix and Salix exigua seedlings were abundant.

Taxon
Tamarix and Salix exiguaTamarixSalix exiguae0
Organ / stage
Seedlingse0
Outcome
abundante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tamarix
Tamarix · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryBernard DUPONT from FRANCE · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Salix exigua
Salix exigua · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Curtis Clark assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of Tamarix and Salix exigua were abundant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1014 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salix exigua seedlings were much more abundant than below Glen Canyon Dam.

Taxon
Salix exiguaSalix exiguae1
Organ / stage
Seedlingse1
Outcome
far more abundante0
Direction
far more abundante0
Comparator
below the Glen Canyon Dam in Grand Canyone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix exigua
Salix exigua · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Curtis Clark assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with the latter being far more abundant than below the Glen Canyon Dam in Grand Canyon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seedlings of Tamarix and Salix exigua were abundant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1014 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Populus fremontii and Salix gooddingii seedlings were rare.

Taxon
Populus fremontii and Salix gooddingiiPopulus fremontiiSalix gooddingiie0
Organ / stage
seedlingse0
Outcome
raree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus fremontii
Populus fremontii · TaxonAmy Gaiennie, NPS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Salix gooddingii
Salix gooddingii · TaxonStan Shebs · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seedlings of Populus fremontii and Salix gooddingii were rare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1174 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent soil characteristic affinities of Tamarix and Salix exigua remained difficult to interpret without experiments.

Taxon
Tamarix and Salix exiguaTamarixSalix exiguae0
Outcome
affinities of Tamarix and Salix exigua for certain soil characteristicse0
Qualifier
difficult to interpret without complementary experimental studiese0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tamarix
Tamarix · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryBernard DUPONT from FRANCE · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Salix exigua
Salix exigua · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Curtis Clark assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apparent differences in the affinities of Tamarix and Salix exigua for certain soil characteristics including pH, conductivity, and relative concentration of ammonium are difficult to interpret without complementary experimental studies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1412 · show in text ↑