Paper · 1999 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Genotypic variation in sunflower (Helianthus annuus) for salt tolerance

Y. Muralidharudu; G. A. Ravishankar; Manjunatha Hebbara; et al.

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A study was conducted during winter season (rabi) 1995-96' . 1996-97 on 7 sunflower (Helianthus anmaus L.) genotypes for its tolerance to salinity under field conditions on sa. Vertisols (with a salinity gradient ranging from 1.1 to 20 dS/m) of Tungabhadra Project area. The seed yield of sunflower genotypes was correlated.with time weighted mean salinity to compute yield maxima, threshold salinity and slope. 'CO 2', 'PAC 36' and 'PKVSH 27' sunflower performed better than other genotypes at higher salinity levels (> 8 dS/m). The genotypes 'PAC 308', 'CO 4' and 'EC 68414' which were promising under marginally saline conditions (4-8 dS/m) suffered at higher salinity (> 8 dS/m). There was high correlation between the performance of genotypes under saline conditions in the field and laboratory.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO 2, PAC 36 and PKVSH 27 performed better above 8 dS/m.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Material
'CO 2', 'PAC 36' and 'PKVSH 27'e0
Outcome
performed bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
> 8 dS/me0
Comparator
other genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'CO 2', 'PAC 36' and 'PKVSH 27' sunflower performed better than other genotypes at higher salinity levels (> 8 dS/m)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–528 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAC 308, CO 4 and EC 68414 were promising at 4-8 dS/m but suffered above 8 dS/m.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Material
'PAC 308', 'CO 4' and 'EC 68414'e0
Outcome
sufferede0
Qualifier
> 8 dS/me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genotypes 'PAC 308', 'CO 4' and 'EC 68414' which were promising under marginally saline conditions (4-8 dS/m) suffered at higher salinity (> 8 dS/m)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–682 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field and laboratory genotype performance under salinity was highly correlated.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
performance of genotypes under saline conditionse0
Setting
field and laboratorye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was high correlation between the performance of genotypes under saline conditions in the field and laboratory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–52 · show in text ↑