Paper · 1999

Available N changes and N balance under multi ratooning of sugarcane varieties in a tropical vertisol.

B. Sundara; B. K. Tripathi; Vijayata Singh; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Multiratoons (one plant + 3 ratoons) of 12 sugarcane varieties were grown in a tropical vertisol. Available N status of the soil declined by 26.3% at the end of the third ratoon crop despite application of recommended level of N (225 kg ha-') to each of the crops. Additional (25% extra) N application to ratoons registered higher soil available N level than the nonnal rate of application. Sugarcane varieties influenced the soil available Nstatus signiJicantly. In general, high yielding varieties (e.g. Co 8021, Co 8145, Co 8134, Co 6304), reduced the soil available N status greater than the low yielders (e.g. Co 8335, Co 8346). Tlze study indicated a decline in available N status by multiratooning. Additional N applicatiovts to ratoons and in situ trash mulching and incorporation helped to improve multiratoon productivity as well as soil available N status. Nitrogen balance studies indicated greater N losses under multiratooning system thus suggesting the need for appropriate N management practices to reduce N losses and improve N use eflciency. *

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil available N declined by 26.3% by the third sugarcane ratoon despite recommended N application.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
recommended level of N (225 kg ha-')e0
Outcome
Available N status of the soile0
Direction
declinede0
Value
26.3%e0
Qualifier
at the end of the third ratoon crope0

Verbatim

e0

“Available N status of the soil declined by 26.3% at the end of the third ratoon crop despite application of recommended level of N (225 kg ha-') to each of the crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–263 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 25% extra N to ratoons raised soil available N relative to the normal rate.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Additional (25% extra) N application to ratoonse0
Outcome
soil available N levele0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
nonnal rate of applicatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Additional (25% extra) N application to ratoons registered higher soil available N level than the nonnal rate of application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–389 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane variety significantly influenced soil available N status.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Material
Sugarcane varietiese0
Outcome
soil available Nstatuse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane varieties influenced the soil available Nstatus signiJicantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–462 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-yielding sugarcane varieties reduced soil available N more than low-yielding varieties.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
high yielding varietiese0
Outcome
soil available N statuse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
low yielderse0

Verbatim

e0

“high yielding varieties (e.g. Co 8021, Co 8145, Co 8134, Co 6304), reduced the soil available N status greater than the low yielders (e.g. Co 8335, Co 8346)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional N application improved multiratoon productivity.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Additional N applicatiovts to ratoonse0
Outcome
multiratoon productivitye0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Additional N applicatiovts to ratoons and in situ trash mulching and incorporation helped to improve multiratoon productivity as well as soil available N status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional N application improved soil available N status.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Additional N applicatiovts to ratoonse0
Outcome
soil available N statuse0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Additional N applicatiovts to ratoons and in situ trash mulching and incorporation helped to improve multiratoon productivity as well as soil available N status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In situ trash mulching and incorporation improved multiratoon productivity.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
in situ trash mulching and incorporatione0
Outcome
multiratoon productivitye0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Additional N applicatiovts to ratoons and in situ trash mulching and incorporation helped to improve multiratoon productivity as well as soil available N status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In situ trash mulching and incorporation improved soil available N status.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
in situ trash mulching and incorporatione0
Outcome
soil available N statuse0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Additional N applicatiovts to ratoons and in situ trash mulching and incorporation helped to improve multiratoon productivity as well as soil available N status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen losses were greater under multiratooning.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
N lossese0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
under multiratooning systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen balance studies indicated greater N losses under multiratooning system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend N management to reduce N losses and improve N-use efficiency in sugarcane ratooning.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
appropriate N management practices to reduce N losses and improve N use eflciencye0

Verbatim

e0

“suggesting the need for appropriate N management practices to reduce N losses and improve N use eflciency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑

mulching · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 23 positive, 8 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

mulching · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 33 positive, 3 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.