Paper · 2024 · Journal of Plant Development

SOIL AND SUGAR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT INFLUENCED BY MULCHING AND WEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN NIGERIA

Moses Samuel BASSEY; Emmanuel Abraham SHITTU; Ekaette Eunice ETIM; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Yield decline is an issue that has plagued sugarcane production in Nigeria. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effects of sugarcane trash mulch and weed management practices on soil C and N, and sugar quality production. The treatments consisted of factorial combination of two sugarcane genotypes (Bida local and NCS 001), four sugarcane trash mulching levels (0, 3, 6, 9 t ha-1) and four weed management practices: weedy check, 5 monthly hoe weeding (5MHW), pre-emergence (PE) application of diuron at 2 kg a.i./ha + Post-Emergence (POE) of 3-Maize force at 179.2 g/ha + Two hoe weeding (2HW), and PE Diuron + POE 3-Maize force arranged in a split plot design and replicated three times. The results showed that application of 9 t ha-1 trash mulch significantly (P<0.05) produced the highest organic carbon, N, which in turn enhanced sugar yield. Similarly, the application of 9 t ha-1 trash mulch plus PE+POE produced the highest NCS 001 sugar quality. Application of trash mulching at 9 t ha-1 plus PE+POE effectively enhanced soil C and N, and sustained the productivity of NCS 001 sugar quality in the study area and related ecologies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nine tonnes per hectare trash mulch produced the highest soil organic carbon.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
9 t ha-1 trash mulche0
Outcome
organic carbone0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of 9 t ha-1 trash mulch significantly (P<0.05) produced the highest organic carbon, N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–823 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane genotypes (Bida local and NCS 001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nine tonnes per hectare trash mulch produced the highest soil N.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
9 t ha-1 trash mulche0
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of 9 t ha-1 trash mulch significantly (P<0.05) produced the highest organic carbon, N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–823 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane genotypes (Bida local and NCS 001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–334 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher soil carbon and nitrogen under trash mulch enhanced sugar yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
organic carbon, Ne0

Verbatim

e0

“highest organic carbon, N, which in turn enhanced sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane genotypes (Bida local and NCS 001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nine tonnes per hectare trash mulch plus PE+POE produced the highest NCS 001 sugar quality.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Material
NCS 001e0
Treatment
9 t ha-1 trash mulch plus PE+POEe0
Outcome
sugar qualitye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of 9 t ha-1 trash mulch plus PE+POE produced the highest NCS 001 sugar quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–966 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane genotypes (Bida local and NCS 001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trash mulch at 9 t ha-1 plus PE+POE enhanced soil C and N.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
trash mulching at 9 t ha-1 plus PE+POEe0
Outcome
soil C and Ne0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Application of trash mulching at 9 t ha-1 plus PE+POE effectively enhanced soil C and N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1055 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane genotypes (Bida local and NCS 001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trash mulch at 9 t ha-1 plus PE+POE sustained NCS 001 sugar quality productivity.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Material
NCS 001e0
Treatment
trash mulching at 9 t ha-1 plus PE+POEe0
Outcome
productivity of NCS 001 sugar qualitye0
Direction
sustainede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Application of trash mulching at 9 t ha-1 plus PE+POE effectively enhanced soil C and N, and sustained the productivity of NCS 001 sugar quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1112 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane genotypes (Bida local and NCS 001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–334 · show in text ↑

mulching · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

mulching · soil: chemistry · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.